Substitution of Fish Meal and Worm Meal African Night Crawler on the Physical Quality of Fish Feed
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55677/ijlsar/V03I3Y2024-12Keywords:
Substitutes, fish meal, African Night Crawler worm meal, physical of feedAbstract
This research aims to determine the effect of substitution of fish meal and African night crawler worm meal on the quality of fish feed, especially physical aspects. The treatment tested was treatment A with a concentration of 55% fish meal, 10% worm meal, 30% corn meal, and 5% tapioca flour. Treatment B with a concentration of 53% fish meal, 12% worm meal, 30% corn meal, and 5% tapioca flour. Treatment C with a concentration of 49% fish meal, 14% worm meal, 30% corn meal, and 5% tapioca flour. Treatment K with a concentration of 65% fish meal, 0% worm meal, 30% corn meal, and 5% tapioca flour. The data collected consists of data on fish attractiveness to feed, feed solubility, feed hardness level and feed color aspects. The data that has been collected is then analyzed using descriptive analysis. The results of this research show that regarding the attractiveness of the feed to the test animals tested, the feed that received the quickest response from the fish to eat was the feed in treatment K. The solubility of feed in all treatments did not have a significant difference, However, the treatment that dissolved the fastest was treatment B, namely 207 minutes. Based on the level of feed hardness, the lowest level of feed hardness is feed in treatment K, which has a hardness level of 40%. In this research, where the color of the feed made is brown and slightly blackish and is similar in color to commercial feed.
References
REFERENCES
Afrianto, E. & E. Liviawaty. 2005. Fish Feed. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Aggraeni, N.M & N. Abdulgani. 2013. The Effect of Providing Natural Feed and Artificial Feed on the Growth of Betutu Fish (Oxyeleotris marmorata) on Laboratory Scale. Jurnal Sains and Seni Pomits. 2(1): 2337-3520.
Amalia, R., S. Hastuti., and A. Sudaryono. 2019. The Effect of Earthworm Meal (Lumbricus sp.) as an Attractant on Feed Consumption Level, Feed Eficiency and Growth of Catfish (Pangasius sp.). Jurnal Sains Akuakultur Tropis. 3(1):27-35.
Ardani, R. K. 2009. Use of Tapioca Flour at Different Levels in Goldfish Feed (Cyprinus Carpio). Thesis. Aquaculture Management Fund Technology Study Program. FPIK. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Dharmawan, B. 2007. Business for Making Consumer Fish Feed. Pustaka Baru Press. Jogyakarta. 176 p.
Dominy, W.G. & C. Lim. 1991. Performance of Binders in Pelleted Shrimp Diets. Page. 149-157. in: Proceeding of The Aquaculture Feed Processing and Nutrition Workshop (Edt: Akiyama, D.M. & Tan, R.K.H.). Thailand and Indonesia, September 19-25, 1991. A,erican Soybean Association 541 Orchard Road # 11-03 Liat Towers Singapore 0923 Republic of Singapore.
Evans, W., H. Yanto and Sunarto. 2014. Feed Consumption Rate and Growth Performance of Snakehead Fish Seed (Ophiocephalus striatus) by Providing Coot Worm Attractant (Pheretima sp.). Jurnal Ruaya, 1(1): 1-8.
Fahrizal, A., & R. Ratna. 2020. Physical Test and Microbiological Test of Feed Made from Fish Waste from Klaligi Fish Landing Base, Sorong City. (JRPK) Jurnal Riset Perikanan and Kelautan.2(1): 124-134.
Fathia, N. 2016. Physical and Mechanical Tests of Fish Feed Made with Tapioca Flour as Adhesive Material. Skripsi. Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Lampung. 50p.
Handari, R.D. 2012. Technology and Quality Control of Feed Processing at PT Charoen Pokphand Sidoarjo East Java. Faculty of Animal Husbandry. Universitas Gajah Mada. Field Practice Report.
Haryati, E. Saade & A. Pranata. 2011. The Influence of the Substitution Level of Fish Meal with Maggot Meal on the Retention and Efficiency of Nutrient Utilization in the Body of Milkfish (Chanos chanos Forsskål). Universitas Hassanudin, Makassar. pages 1-14.
Haryati, Zainuddin & D. S Putri. 2011. The Influence of the Substitution Level of Fish Meal with Mangot Meal on the Chemical Composition and Body of Milkfish (Chanos Chanos Forsskal). http://222.124.222.229/bitstream/handle/123456789/119/Jurnal%20wi%20Septiani%20Putri.pdf?sequence=2
Irawati., D. Arif, & D. Payung. 2023. Physical Test of Fish Feed Using Sago Starch Binder. Jurnal of Akuakultur Sungai and Danau, 8(1): 8-12.
Istiqomah, A.L., Sofyan, A., Damayanti, & Julendra, H. 2009. Amino Acid Profile Of Earthworm and Earthworm Meal for Animal Feedstuff. J. Indonesian Trop. Anim. Agric, 34 (4), 253-257.
Jahan, M.S., M. Asaduzzaman, & A Sarkar. 2006. Performance of broiler fed on mash, pellet, and crumble. Int J. Poultry Sci. Vol. 5 No. 3 : 265-270.
Khater, E. G, A. H. Bahnasawy dan S. A. Ali. 2014. Physical and Mechanical Properties of Fish Feed Pellets. J Food Technol. Vol 5, No. 10. ISSN: 2157-7110.
Krisnan, R. & S.P. Ginting. 2009. Use of Solid Ex-Decanter as an Adhesive for Making Complete Feed in Pellet Form: Physical Evaluation of Complete Feed in Pellet Form. National Seminar on Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Technology.
Meyer, S.P. & Z.P. Zein-Eldin. 1972. Binders and Pellet Stability in Development of Crustacean Diets. Reprinted from Proc. 3rd Ann. Work-shop-World Maricult. Socc., St. Petterburg, Florida. Jan. 26 – 28, 1972. Hal. 351 – 364.
Mubarok, A., & Zalizar, L. 2003. Earthworm Cultivation as an Alternative Business in Times of Economic Crisis. Jurnal Dedikasi, 1(1): 129-135.
Mudjiman, A. 2004. Fish Food. Revised Edition. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya.
Mudjiman, A. 2008. Fish Food. Revised Edition. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya
Mulia, D.S., F. Wulandari., & H. Maryanto. 2017. Physical Test Of Fish Feed Using Cassava Flour Binder. Jurnal Riset Sains dan Teknologi. 1(1): 37-44.
Rachmawati, D., I. Samidjan., & Sarjito. 2016. Substitution of Fish Meal with Earthworm Meal (Lumbricus rubellus) In Artificial Feed on the Growth of Tiger Grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus). Proceedings of the 2016 National Maritime Seminar, Trunojoyo University, Madura, 27 July 2016. 321-327.
Saade, E., & Alamsyah, S. 2009. Physical and Chemical Tests of Artificial Feed for Tiger Prawns Penaeus monodon Fab. Which uses various types of seaweed as adhesive. Torani: Jurnal Ilmu Kelautan dan Perikanan. 19(2): 107-115.
Sumeru, S. U. & Anna S. 1992. Tiger Prawn Feed. Kanasius Publishers, Yogjakarta.
Taris, M.R ., L. Santoso., & E. Harpen. 2018. Effect of Substituting Fish Meal with Earthworm Meal (Lumbricus sp.) On the Growth of Tiger Prawn Fry (Penaeus monodon). e-Jurnal Rekayasa and Teknologi Budidaya Perairan. 6(2): 699-704.
Utomo, N. B. 2015. Small Scale Fish Feed Manufacturing. Jakarta: SEAMEO BIOTROP.
Widyasunu, C.A., I. Samidjan., & D. Rachmawati. 2013. Substitution of Fish Meal with Earthworm Meal (Lumbricus rubellus) in the Artificial Diet on Growth and Efficiency of Feed Utilization Tiger Grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus). Journal of Aquaculture Management and Technology. 2(1): 38-51.
Yatno. 2011. Fractionation and Physico-Chemical Properties of Palm Kernel Cake. Jurnal Angrinak. 1(1): 11-16.
Yulianto,T. 2018. Stability, Buoyancy and Color and Aroma Tests on Different Pellets. Journal of Dinamika Maritim. 6(2): 5-8.
