Effect of NaCL and CaSO4 on Activty of Rhizobium Bacteria and Testing its Efficincy of Produceing IAA, Enzymes in Gypsiferous Soil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55677/ijlsar/V04I01Y2025-07Keywords:
Rhizobium, Bacteria, gypsiferous soil, sodium chloride.Abstract
Rhizobium bacteria are of significant environmental and agricultural importance. However, the impact of salts on the growth of these bacteria is a crucial topic that warrants research, particularly in areas with high soil salinity levels. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the effects of sodium chloride (NaCl) and calcium sulfate (CaSO4) on the activity of Rhizobium bacteria and to evaluate their efficiency in producing amino acids and enzymes in gypsum soils. A laboratory experiment was conducted at the Soil Science and Water Resources Department, College of Agriculture, Tikrit University, during the academic year 2021-2022. Rhizobium bacteria were isolated from gypsum soil, and the best isolates were selected based on their activity and spread. These isolates were then morphologically characterized. A total of 10 isolates were obtained and identified according to their agricultural and microscopic characteristics. The growth rates of the isolated bacteria on YEMA medium varied from one isolate to another. Six isolates (BR1, BR3, BR5, BR6, BR9, BR10) grew after being incubated for 7 days at 28°C, and were classified as slow-growing Bradyrhizobium bacteria. Meanwhile, four isolates (BR2, BR4, BR7, BR8) grew on the same medium and were classified as fast-growing Rhizobium bacteria. All isolates exhibited the ability to produce indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) at varying levels, with the highest production recorded in isolate BR5 (13.9 µg·mL-1), followed by isolate BR4 (12.6 µg·mL-1). The lowest IAA production was observed in isolate BR2 (6.5 µg·mL-1).
All isolates were able to produce catalase, except for isolate BR10. Six isolates successfully produced the oxidase enzyme, while four isolates did not. Seven isolates produced urease, while three isolates failed to do so. Additionally, five isolates produced nitrate reductase enzyme.
The best isolate of Rhizobium was selected for further testing using four levels of calcium sulfate (0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 g·L-1) and four levels of sodium chloride (0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 g·L-1) to determine the optimal level of each salt that the bacteria could tolerate and grow in. The results showed that the bacterial colony growth exceeded 60% at all levels above 0.5 g·L-1 of CaSO4, with continued bacterial growth at higher levels of CaSO4. The control treatment (0 g·L-1) exhibited only 10% growth, as the bacteria require gypsum for growth. As for the sodium chloride levels, the 0.2 g·L-1 level showed the best bacterial growth (50%), while growth decreased to 10% at the 0.6 g·L-1 level due to the bacteria's inability to tolerate high levels of sodium chloride. The 0 g·L-1 level exhibited the lowest growth, indicating the bacteria's requirement for elemental sodium and chloride during growth, but only at a specific threshold.
References
1. Ali, Q., Shabaan, M., Ashraf, S., Kamran, M., Zulfiqar, U., Ahmad, M., ... & Arslan, M. 2023. Comparative efficacy of different salt tolerant rhizobial inoculants in improving growth and productivity of Vigna radiata L. under salt stress. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 17442.
2. Al-Jumaily, M. M., Al-Hamandi, H. M., Al-Obaidi, M. A., & Al-Zidan, R. R. 2022. Quantity-intensity ratio of potassium in gypsiferous soils in Iraq. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, 52, e71620.
3. Alkurtany, A. E. S., Altai, S. H. M., & Alsamarrai, N. S. H. 2022. Phenotypic and molecular diagnosis of Rhizobium bacteria isolated from Vigna unguiculata plants grown in gypsiferous soils and testing their efficiency in producing indole acetic acid, chelating compounds and dissolving phosphates. Biochemical & Cellular Archives, 22(1).
4. Altai, S. H. M., Khalefah, K. M., & Amin, E. A. M. 2022. Isolation and identification of Rhizobium bacteria from Faba bean (Vicia faba L.) roots grown in gypsiferous soil and testing their efficiency in production growth regulate (IAA) and siderophorses. Tikrit Journal for Agricultural Sciences, 22(4), 96-105.
5. Bertin, L., Laurent, F., & Calvaruso, C. (2003). Sulfur cycle in soils: Impact on the sulfur cycling and sulfur bacterial populations. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35(12), 1789–1795.
6. Brockwell, J., Bottomley, P. J., & Thies, J. E. 1995. Manipulation of rhizobia microflora for improving legume productivity and soil fertility: a critical assessment. In Management of Biological Nitrogen Fixation for the Development of More Productive and Sustainable Agricultural Systems: Extended versions of papers presented at the Symposium on Biological Nitrogen Fixation for Sustainable Agriculture at the 15th Congress of Soil Science, Acapulco, Mexico, 1994 (pp. 143-180). Springer Netherlands.
7. Chen, H., Zhang, C., & Li, Y. (2018). The role of sulfate-reducing bacteria in sulfur metabolism in soil. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 102(18), 7415–7425.
8. Chhaya Datta, P.S. Basu, 2000, Indole acetic acid production by a Rhizobium species from root nodules of a leguminous shrub, Cajanus cajan, Microbiological Research, Volume 155, Issue 2,P 123-127,ISSN 0944-5013.
9. Collee, J. G.; Miles, R. S. and Watt, B. 1996.Tests for the identification of bacteria. In: Mackie and McCartney's practical Medical Microbiology , 14th Edition,(Eds.),14 :131-149.
10. Gopalakrishnan, S., Srinivas, V., Vemula, A., Samineni, S., & Rathore, A. (2018). Influence of diazotrophic bacteria on nodulation, nitrogen fixation, growth promotion and yield traits in five cultivars of chickpea. Biocatalysis and agricultural biotechnology, 15, 35-42.
11. Hassan, G. (2017). Soil salinity and its management in arid and semi-arid regions: A case study of gypsum-rich soils. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 17(4), 933-942.
12. Hernández, J. A. 2019. Salinity tolerance in plants: trends and perspectives. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(10), 2408.
13. Herridge, D. F., Peoples, M. B., & Boddey, R. M. 2008. Global inputs of biological nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. Plant and soil, 311, 1-18.
14. Hussain, M. B., Mehboob, I., Zahir, Z. A., Naveed, M., & Asghar, H. N. 2009. Potential of Rhizobium spp. for improving growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Soil Environ, 28(1), 49-55.
15. Igiehon, N. O., Babalola, O. O., & Aremu, B. R. (2019). Genomic insights into plant growth promoting rhizobia capable of enhancing soybean germination under drought stress. BMC microbiology, 19, 1-22.
16. Kaur, K., Sharma, P., Kaur, N. and Gill, B. S. 2012. Phenotypic and Biochemical Characterization of Bradyrhizobium and Ensifer spp. Isolated from Soybean Rhizosphere. Bioscience Discovery, 3(1): 40-46.
17. Khalid, R., Zhang, X. X., Hayat, R., & Ahmed, M. (2020). Molecular characteristics of rhizobia isolated from Arachis hypogaea grown under stress environment. Sustainability, 12(15), 6259.
18. Liu, Y., Zhang, Q., & Liu, X. (2020). Indole-3-acetic acid production and its impact on plant growth. Plant Growth Regulation, 90(2), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-020-00559-1
19. Meena, V. S., Meena, S. K., Verma, J. P., Kumar, A., Aeron, A., Mishra, P. K., ... & Dotaniya, M. L. (2017). Plant beneficial rhizospheric microorganism (PBRM) strategies to improve nutrients use efficiency: a review. Ecological Engineering, 107, 8-32.
20. Mir, M. I., Hameeda, B., Quadriya, H., Kumar, B. K., Ilyas, N., Kee Zuan, A. T., ... & Sayyed, R. Z. (2022). Multifarious indigenous diazotrophic rhizobacteria of rice (Oryza sativa L.) rhizosphere and their effect on plant growth promotion. Frontiers in Nutrition, 8, 781764.
21. Oren, A. (2011). The ecology of halophilic microorganisms. Environmental Microbiology, 13(9), 1909–1923.
22. Park, K. H., et al. (2007). Effect of oxygen availability on oxidative stress and enzyme production in rhizobia. Microbial Ecology, 53(3), 427–434.
23. Rashid, A., et al. (2020). The impact of gypsum on soil fertility and its potential for sustainable agriculture. Environmental Sustainability, 8(1), 45-56.
24. Schimel, J. P., & Bennett, J. 2004. Nitrogen mineralization: challenges of a changing paradigm. Ecology, 85(3), 591-602.
25. Schwender, J., et al. (2021). The role of indole-3-acetic acid in the relationship between Rhizobium and leguminous plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 623209. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.623209
26. Shamseldin, A., & Werner, D. 2005. High salt and high pH tolerance of new isolated Rhizobium etli strains from Egyptian soils. Current microbiology, 50, 11-16.
27. Shao, H., Chu, L. M., & Yu, L. (2008). Impact of NaCl on microbial diversity in soils: A review. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 1(6), 428–438.
28. Sharma, A., & Kumar, A. (2016). Urease production by Rhizobium species and its role in nitrogen fixation. Microbial Ecology, 12(1), 34–45.
29. Sharma, M., & Dahiya, R. (2019). Impact of gypsum on soil salinity and crop growth in saline soils. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 67(5), 1370-1379.
30. Sindhu, S., Dahiya, A., Gera, R., & Sindhu, S. S. 2020. Mitigation of abiotic stress in legume-nodulating rhizobia for sustainable crop production. Agricultural Research, 9(4), 444-459.
31. Singha, B. S., Mazumder, P. B., & Piyush Pandey, P. P. (2018). Characterization of plant growth promoting rhizobia from root nodule of two legume species cultivated in Assam, India.
32. Singleton, P. W., El Swaify, S. A., & Bohlool, B. B. 1982. Effect of salinity on Rhizobium growth and survival. Applied and Environmental microbiology, 44(4), 884-890.
33. Somasegaran, P., Hoben, H. J., (1994). Collecting nodules and isolating rhizobia. Handbook for rhizobia: methods in legume-Rhizobium technology, 7-23.
34. Van Hees, A., & Meijer, H. (2017). The role of nitrate reductase in nitrogen fixation and crop productivity. Journal of Agricultural Chemistry, 65(2), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1002/jac.381
35. Verma, H., Patra, R. K., Sethi, D., & Pattanayak, S. K. 2022. Isolation and characterization of native Rhizobium from root nodules of raikia french bean growing area of Odisha. Indian Journal of Biochemistry and Biophysics (IJBB), 59(9), 918-926.
36. Yao, H., Wei, L., & Xie, X. (2016). Effects of soil salinity on the microbial community composition and activity in a saline-alkali soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 80(2), 418–428.
37. Yildirim, E., et al. (2009). Effect of Rhizobium inoculation and indole-3-acetic acid production on the growth of beans. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 28(4), 376-381.
38. Zhang, Z., Li, F., & Zheng, M. (2017). Impact of sulfate addition on soil microbial diversity and enzyme activity. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 63(3), 278–288.
39. Zhou, J., Liu, X., & Zhao, J. (2018). Soil salinity alters microbial communities and enzyme activity. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 18(2), 343–352.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Life Science and Agriculture Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.