Assessing the Extent of Implementation of Good Camel Feeding Practices by Camel Breeders

Author's Information:

Mansour H. Al-Mutairi

Saudi Food and Drug Authority, 4904 northern ring branch rd Hittin Dist Unit number: 1 Riyadh 13513 – 7148, Saudi Arabia

Vol 04 No 07 (2025):Volume 04 Issue 07 July 2025

Page No.: 414-422

Abstract:

Camels are integral to Saudi Arabia's culture and heritage, playing a significant role in the nation's economy. They are valued for their meat and milk, which offer high nutritional value and numerous health benefits. Additionally, camels contribute to rural development through trade and beauty contests. Globally, interest in camel products has risen due to their health properties. In response, Saudi Arabia has established the "Camel Club" to promote the sector, which is essential in achieving food security as part of Saudi Vision 2030. However, good nutrition has positive effects on both the health of the animal and its food products. There is a lack of local studies on camel breeders' feeding practices in Saudi Arabia, making this study crucial. The study aims to assess how camel breeders in Saudi Arabia follow good nutrition practices. It seeks to identify the characteristics of breeders and evaluate their feeding practices. A descriptive approach was employed, using a survey distributed to a representative sample of 442 breeders. Data were collected through a questionnaire and analyzed statistically. The results revealed that 41% of breeders rely on traditional feeding systems, primarily using barley and alfalfa, while 52.5% do not use compound feed, there remains a need for greater efforts to improve certain practices. While camel breeders are generally aware of the importance of good camel nutrition, several practices require improvement. The study recommends raising awareness about good and balanced nutrition, providing training programs on best practices in camel nutrition, and providing supportive infrastructure to help breeders improve their practices.

KeyWords:

Camels, good practices, feeding practices, camel breeders, Saudi Arabia.

References:

1. Abrhaley A and Leta S. (2017). Medicinal value of camel milk and meat. J Appl Anim Res. 2018;46(1):552-558. doi:10.1080/09712119.2017.1357562

2. Alexandratos, N., Bruinsma, J. (2012). World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. www.fao.org/3/a-ap106e.pdf.

3. Almutairi, M.H., Al-Zahrani, K.H and Qassem, H.S. (2023). Assessment of livestock breeder’s attitude towards the use of compound feed in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J. Livestock Sci. 14: 308-316.

4. Almutairi, M.H. (2024). Assessing the Impact of Compound Feed on Livestock: Saudi Arabian Livestock Breeders Perspective. J. Livestock Sci. 15: 242-248.

5. Berhe T, Seifu E, Ipsen R, Kurtu MY, Hansen EB. 2017. Processing Challenges and Opportunities of Camel Dairy Products. Int J Food Sci. 2017;2017. doi:10.1155/2017/9061757.

6. Blanco, C., Giráldez. F. J., Prieto, N., Benavides, A, J., Wattegedera, S., Morán, L., Andrés, b. S., and Bodas, R. (2015). Total mixed ration pellets for light fattening lambs: effects on animal health. Animal, 9(2): 258-266. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114002249 .

7. Bouxin. A. (2014). Management of safety in the feed chain. In: Lelieveld, H. and Motarjemi, Y. (Eds.). Food safety management: A practical guide for the food industry. Academic Press. (23-43). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-381504-0.00002-0.

8. Codex Alimentarius. (2004). Code of practice on good animal feeding. Section 4. CAC/RCP 54-2004. https://www.ipcinfo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/livestockgov/documents/CXP_054a.pdf

9. ESCWA. (United Nations). (2018). Adopting Good Agricultural Practices to Improve Food Safety in the Arab Region. Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia. Beirut, Lebanon.

10. FAO, (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). )2016(. Livestock Contribution to Food Security in the Near East and North Africa. Thirty-third Session. FAO, Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/a-mp852e.pdf.

11. GASTAT, General Authority for Statistics, Detailed results of the agricultural census.2020. Kingdom Saudi Arabia, Page No. 68.

12. John. K. (2019). Comparative assessment of feed formulation among livestock farmers in Kakiri sub–county Wakiso district. Doctoral dissertation, Makerere University, Uganda. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12281/8404.

13. Lee, S. Y., Lee, B. Y., Lim, B., Uzzaman, R., Jang, G., & Kim, K. S. (2024). Exploring the importance of predicted camel NRAP exon 4 for environmental adaptation using a mouse model. Animal Genetics, 00, 1–11.

14. Lukuyu, B., Franzel, S., Ongadi, P. M and Duncan, A. J. (2011). Livestock feed resources: Current production and management practices in central and northern rift valley provinces of Kenya. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 23(5), 112. https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/3817.

15. Makkar, H. P., Tran, G., Heuze, V., Giger-Reverdin, S., Lessire, M., Lebas, F and Ankers, P. (2016). Seaweeds for livestock diets: A review. Animal Feed Science and Technology: 212:1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.09.018.

16. Marshall, K. N., Mtimet, F., Wanyoike, N., Ndiwa and H. Ghebremariam. (2018). The traditional livestock breeding practices of women and men Somali pastoralists: Breeding management and beliefs on breeding issues. Anim. Prod. Sci. 59: 1568-1583.

17. MEWA, Ministry of Environment, Water and Agriculture, (2021). Total numbers of animals according to health card, unpublished data, Ministry of Environment, Water and Agriculture, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

18. MEWA, Ministry of Environment, Water and Agriculture, (2020). Professional Guide for Livestock Breeders - Livestock Nutrition, National Plan to Improve Livestock Sector Productivity, Ministry of Environment, Water and Agriculture, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

19. Robinson, T. P., Thornton, P. K., Francesconi, G. N., Kruska, R. L., Chiozza, F., Notenbaert, A. M. O., Cecchi1, G., Herrero, M., Epprecht, M., Fritz, S., Liang You, L., Conchedda, G and See, L. (2011). Global livestock production systems. FAO, Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/i2414e/i2414e.pdf.

20. Salama, F. A., Mohamed, F. A and Keneber, KH. A. A. (2019). Unsafe practices in animals and poultry production in rural areas of Menoufia governorate. Menoufia Journal of Agricultural Economic and Social Sciences, 4(2): 183-184. https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/mjabes.2019.174609.

21. Stephens, E. C., Jones, A. D and Parsons, D. (2018). Agricultural systems research and global food security in the 21st century: An overview and roadmap for future opportunities. Agricultural Systems, 163: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.011.

22. Sun, H. Z and Guan, L. L. (2018). Feedomics: Promises for food security with sustainable food animal production. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 107: 131-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.07.025.

23. Swelum, AA., El-Saadony MT and Abdo M. (2021). Nutritional, antimicrobial and medicinal properties of Camel’s milk: A review. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021;28(5):3126-3136. doi:10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.02.057

24. World Food Summit. (1996). Rome Declaration on World Food Security.

25. Zhong, R., Zhao, C., Feng, P., Wang, Y., Zhao, X., Luo, D., Cheng, L., Liu, D and Fang, Y. (2020). Effects of feeding ground versus pelleted total mixed ration on digestion, rumen function and milk production performance of dairy cows. International Journal of Dairy Technology, 73(1): 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0307.12656.