Simulating the Impacts of Global Palm Oil and Soybean Oil Market Dynamics on Economic and Social SDG Indicators in Major Producing Countries

Author's Information:

Nurachmat Herlambang

Doctoral Program in Agricultural Sciences, Jambi University, Jambi, Indonesia

Zulkifli Alamsyah

Faculty of Agriculture, Jambi University, Jambi, Indonesia

Dompak Napitupulu

Faculty of Agriculture, Jambi University, Jambi, Indonesia

Adriani Adriani

Faculty of Animal Science, Jambi University, Jambi, Indonesia

Mirawati Yanita

Faculty of Agriculture, Jambi University, Jambi, Indonesia

Karina Rahmah

Faculty of Agriculture, Jambi University, Jambi, Indonesia

Vol 05 No 10 (2026):Volume 05 Issue 10 October 2026

Page No.: 702-715

Abstract:

Global vegetable-oil markets are increasingly interconnected, allowing productivity changes in major producing countries to propagate through prices, trade, production, and economic activity. This study examined how simulated productivity improvements in major palm-oil and soybean-oil producing countries affected economic and social Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) indicators through global market linkages. A validated simultaneous-equation model of the global palm-oil and soybean-oil markets was used to conduct historical and forecasting simulations. The scenarios imposed exogenous productivity increases in major producing countries, namely Indonesia and Malaysia for palm oil and Brazil, China, Argentina, and the United States for soybean oil. The simulated effects were traced across four SDG-related indicators: decent work and economic growth, poverty, inequality, and hunger. The simulations revealed substantial cross-country spillovers from productivity shocks, demonstrating that improvements in production efficiency generated effects beyond the country where the shock originated. Economic responses were most consistently reflected in decent work and economic growth, while responses in poverty, inequality, and hunger were more heterogeneous across countries. Productivity gains in major exporters also altered competitive conditions between palm oil and soybean oil through changes in international supply, prices, and trade flows. The results further indicated that economic gains were not automatically translated into broad-based social improvements. Productivity enhancement in globally integrated vegetable-oil markets can strengthen economic performance while simultaneously generating heterogeneous social outcomes across producing countries. The findings highlight the importance of combining productivity-oriented strategies with value addition, inclusive distribution mechanisms, and social protection to ensure that market-driven economic gains contribute more broadly to sustainable development.

KeyWords:

Productivity shocks, Vegetable-oil markets, Spillover effects, Simultaneous- equation model, Sustainable development, Cross-country transmission

References:

  1. Trostle R. Global agricultural supply and demand: factors contributing to the recent increase in food commodity prices. 2008; 
  2. Rosillo-Calle F, Pelkmans L, Walter A. A global overview of vegetable oils, with reference to biodiesel. A Rep IEA Bioenergy Task. 2009;40:1–89. 
  3. Trostle R. Global agricultural supply and demand: factors contributing to the recent increase in food commodity prices (rev. Diane Publishing; 2010. 
  4. Mustafa G, Iqbal A. Economics of oil plants: Demand, supply, and international trade. In: Oil crop genomics. Springer; 2021. p. 393–413. 
  5. Mielke T. World markets for vegetable oils and animal fats: Dynamics of global production, trade flows, consumption and prices. In: Biokerosene: Status and prospects. Springer; 2017. p. 147–88. 
  6. Paramita DNL, Wardah FR, Firmanda SA, Atmaja PP. Agricultural Development: Production, Policy, and Institution Nexus in Perkin’s Framework. Indones J Sustain Agric Environ Sci. 2025;1(2):97–111. 
  7. Abiri R, Rizan N, Balasundram SK, Shahbazi AB, Abdul-Hamid H. Application of digital technologies for ensuring agricultural productivity. Heliyon. 2023;9(12). 
  8. Krishna KL, Meenakshi J V. Agricultural productivity growth and structural transformation in rural India: Some recent evidence. J Quant Econ. 2022;20(Suppl 1):277–302. 
  9. Sassi M. Economic connectiveness and pro-poor growth in sub-Saharan Africa: The role of agriculture. Sustainability. 2023;15(3):2026. 
  10. Marion P, Lwamba E, Floridi A, Pande S, Bhattacharyya M, Young S, et al. The effects of agricultural output market access interventions on agricultural, socio-economic, food security, and nutrition outcomes in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024;20(2):cl2-1411. 
  11. Wang Y, Wang B, Wang X, Bai X. Does high-value agriculture exacerbate rural household income inequality? Evidence from China’s national advantageous agricultural product zones policy. China Agric Econ Rev. 2026;1–26. 
  12. Nowfal SH, Rani NM, Rajassekharan D, Praneeth KR, Dadhabai S, Ramesh S, et al. The Impact of Export-Oriented Agricultural Policies on Farm-Level Income, Production Efficiency, and Market Stability in the Context of Asia. Res World Agric Econ. 2025;685–701. 
  13. Hillbom E, Bolt J, De Haas M, Tadei F. Income inequality and export‐oriented commercialization in colonial Africa: Evidence from six countries. Econ Hist Rev. 2024;77(3):975–1004. 
  14. Hassan NAM, Zakaria K, Salleh KM, Ahmad SM. An empirical analysis of Malaysian palm oil export to world main palm oil importing countries: evidence from a panel cointegration model. Oper Res Decis. 2023;33(1). 
  15. Pratama BR, Tooy D, Kim J. Price Competition and Shifting Demand: The Relation between Palm and Coconut Oil Exports. Sustainability 2024, 16, 101. htps. doi org/103390/su16010101 Acad Ed Flavio Boccia Daniela Covino Receiv. 2023;23. 
  16. Mahajan R, Kumar S, Lim WM, Sareen M. The role of business and management in driving the sustainable development goals (SDGs): Current insights and future directions from a systematic review. Bus Strateg Environ. 2024;33(5):4493–529. 
  17. Raman R, Gunasekar S, Ray S, Behera D, Nedungadi P, Dénes DL. A holistic approach to Sustainable Development Goal 8: Integrating economic growth, employment, and sustainability. Equilibrium Q J Econ Econ Policy. 2025;20(1):147–202. 
  18. Araujo GR, da Silva FL, Adegas FS, Velini ED, la Cruz RA de. Brazil as a Global Leader in Soybean Production: Historical Trends, Current Status, and Future Perspectives. Int J Plant Prod. 2026;20(2):56. 
  19. Peng D, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Yu L, Chen M, Chen JM, et al. Global soybean trade dynamics: Drivers, impacts, and sustainability. Innov (Cambridge. 2025;7(2):101124. 
  20. Martignone GMB, Ghosh B, Papadas D, Behrendt K. The rise of Soybean in international commodity markets: A quantile investigation. Heliyon. 2024;10(15). 
  21. Suroso AI. The effect of logistics performance index indicators on palm oil and palm-based products export: The case of Indonesia and Malaysia. Economies. 2022;10(10):261. 
  22. Papilo P, Marimin M, Hambali E, Machfud M, Yani M, Asrol M, et al. Palm oil-based bioenergy sustainability and policy in Indonesia and Malaysia: A systematic review and future agendas. Heliyon. 2022;8(10). 
  23. Mignon V. Simultaneous Equations Models. In: Principles of Econometrics: Theory and Applications. Springer; 2024. p. 351–77. 
  24. Gardebroek C, Kornelis M. Model building in Agricultural Economics with Machine Learning: Echoes from the past. 2025; 
  25. Kokkinopoulou E, Vrontis D, Thrassou A. The impact of education on productivity and externalities of economic development and social welfare: a systematic literature review. Cent Eur Manag J. 2026;34(1):89–112. 
  26. Lyu S, Chen Z, Pan S, Liu L. Market integration and economic growth. PLoS One. 2023;18(11):e0294467. 
  27. Abramova M, Artemenko D, Krinichansky K. Transmission channels between financial deepening and economic growth: Econometric analysis comprising monetary factors. Mathematics. 2022;10(2):242.