International Journal of Life Science and Agriculture Research

Soil water content monitoring during the generative phase of sweet maize is critical for irrigation decisions in precision agriculture, yet conventional destructive sampling is too slow and spatially limited for field-scale management. This study evaluated whether pansharpening improves or degrades the accuracy of eight spectral indices for estimating SWC through an index-by-index comparison. The study was conducted on a 720 m² field of fertilizer-dose treatment plots in Ciparanje, Jatinangor, Indonesia, with 15 purposively selected sampling points. Multispectral imagery was acquired with a DJI Matrice 350 RTK UAV and MicaSense Altum-PT sensor at 30 m altitude and 80% overlap, yielding 1.24 cm/pixel ground sample distance before and 0.62 cm/pixel after pansharpening. Eight indices were correlated with gravimetric SWC via Spearman correlation and linear regression, cross-checked with classical assumption tests. Pansharpening improved spatial resolution with generally preserved spectral quality, though the NIR and RedEdge bands showed the weakest fidelity. The effect on SWC estimation was index-dependent: NDVI was essentially preserved, whereas SAVI and MSAVI lost 25.0% and 22.7% of their explanatory power; red-edge and water-based indices remained unchanged, and TVDI was non-significant. Only the red-edge indices CIre and NDRE satisfied all classical regression assumptions in both products; the pansharpened NDRE model (R² = 0.4177, RMSE = 1.5021, p = 0.009) was therefore used to generate a field-capacity-based SWC map of the 720 m² field, providing zone-specific irrigation guidance. Pansharpening thus benefits SWC estimation depending on index formulation, supporting an index-specific processing rule for irrigation scheduling in regenerative sweet maize.

Pansharpening, Soil Water Content, Sweet Maize, Spectral Indices, UAV.

1. D. Lestari, A. M. Firmansyah, R. P. CNAWP, M. Andriani, T. M. Syahniar, and P. R. Ratri, “Morpho-Physiological Response of Sweet Corn (Zea mays L. Var saccharata Sturt) Bonanza F1 Variety to Drought Stress and Potassium Fertilizer Application,” JURNAL AGRONOMI TANAMAN TROPIKA (JUATIKA), vol. 7, no. 2, May 2025, doi: 10.36378/juatika.v7i2.4620.
2. J. M. Viceli, A. C. B. Acosta, E. Pocojeski, C. A. Casali, N. C. H. Kessler, and D. Tessaro, “Influence of soil water content on chemical and microbiological characteristics of selected riparian forests in southern Brazil,” Wetl. Ecol. Manag., vol. 33, no. 2, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11273-025-10041-8.
3. Y. Hao et al., “Soil moisture controls over carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas emissions: a review,” Dec. 01, 2025, Nature Research. doi: 10.1038/s41612-024-00888-8.
4. Z. Cao, H. Gao, Z. Nan, Y. Zhao, and Z. Yin, “A semi-physical approach for downscaling satellite soil moisture data in a typical cold alpine area, Northwest China,” Remote Sens. (Basel)., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1–26, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.3390/rs13030509.
5. B. E. Cahyono, P. O. Putri, A. Subekti, A. T. Nugroho, and K. Nishi, “Analysis of soil moisture as an indicator of land quality using vegetation index (SAVI and NDMI) retrieved from remote sensing data in Jember - Indonesia,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics Inc., Mar. 2022. doi: 10.1063/5.0078761.
6. F. Lu, Y. Sun, and F. Hou, “Using UAV visible images to estimate the soil moisture of steppe,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 9, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.3390/W12092334.
7. M. Jurišić, D. Radočaj, I. Plaščak, S. D. Galić, and D. Petrović, “THE EVALUATION OF THE RGB AND MULTISPECTRAL CAMERA ON THE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (UAV) FOR THE MACHINE LEARNING CLASSIFICATION OF MAIZE,” Poljoprivreda, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 74–80, 2022, doi: 10.18047/poljo.28.2.10.
8. Q. Chen, E. Vaudour, A. C. Richer-de-Forges, and D. Arrouays, “Spectral indices in remote sensing of soil: definition, popularity, and issues. A critical overview,” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 329, p. 114918, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114918.
9. A. Sekrecka, M. Kedzierski, and D. Wierzbicki, “Pre-processing of panchromatic images to improve object detection in pansharpened images,” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 19, no. 23, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.3390/s19235146.
10. E. Alcaras and C. Parente, “The Effectiveness of Pan-Sharpening Algorithms on Different Land Cover Types in GeoEye-1 Satellite Images,” J. Imaging, vol. 9, no. 5, May 2023, doi: 10.3390/jimaging9050093.
11. K. Rokni, “INVESTIGATING THE IMPACT OF PAN SHARPENING ON THE ACCURACY OF LAND COVER MAPPING IN LANDSAT OLI IMAGERY,” Geodesy and Cartography (Vilnius), vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 12–18, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3846/gac.2023.15308.
12. S. Modak, J. Heil, and A. Stein, “Pansharpening Low-Altitude Multispectral Images of Potato Plants Using a Generative Adversarial Network,” Remote Sens. (Basel)., vol. 16, no. 5, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.3390/rs16050874.
13. F. Dadrass Javan, F. Samadzadegan, S. Mehravar, A. Toosi, R. Khatami, and A. Stein, “A review of image fusion techniques for pan-sharpening of high-resolution satellite imagery,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 171, pp. 101–117, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.11.001.
14. M. Ciotola et al., “Hyperspectral Pansharpening: Critical review, tools, and future perspectives,” IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 311–338, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1109/MGRS.2024.3509139.
15. MicaSense, “‘Panchromatic Band – FAQs,’ MicaSense Knowledge Base.”
16. L. Wu, X. Jiang, J. Peng, G. Wu, and X. Xiong, “A spectral preserved model based on spectral contribution and dependence with detail injection for pansharpening,” Sci. Rep., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 6882, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33574-5.
17. Agisoft, “‘Orthomosaic Pansharpening,’ Agisoft Helpdesk.”
18. J. Procházka, J. Komárek, D. Moravec, J. Rous, and T. Klouček, “Pansharpening largely preserves the normalized difference vegetation index: a multi-sensor comparison with PRISMA, Landsat 9, and field spectroscopy,” Frontiers in Remote Sensing, vol. 6, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.3389/frsen.2025.1713895.
19. P. Ghimire, D. Lei, and N. Juan, “Effect of Image Fusion on Vegetation Index Quality—A Comparative Study from Gaofen-1, Gaofen-2, Gaofen-4, Landsat-8 OLI and MODIS Imagery,” Remote Sens. (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 10, p. 1550, May 2020, doi: 10.3390/rs12101550.
20. M. A. Haque et al., “Effects of Environmental Conditions on Vegetation Indices from Multispectral Images: A Review,” Aug. 01, 2024, Korean Society of Remote Sensing. doi: 10.7780/kjrs.2024.40.4.1.